There are a few phenomena in the computer gaming industry I
will probably forever fail to understand. One of them, and one I
believe many people will forever fail to understand, is the Deer
Hunter phenomenon. I do not see how, whether for a professional
hunter, or for an amateur who?s scared of a real gun, hunting
virtual deer can be fun. Along similar lines, I fail to understand
how pool can be fun on the computer. Granted, the king of pools,
Virtual Pool and its sequel, Virtual Pool 2 are classics - but those
games actually teach you rules of pool (though when I went to
play with a few friends and tried to quote VP2 rules they laughed
at me), and allow you to experiment with various types of shots,
strength and so forth. Mind, when you get to a real pool table, you
find out that all those complicated paths you traced out with your
cue ball easily on VP2 are virtually impossible to do on a real pool
table, but at least you think you can do it. Self-esteem is
always a good thing.
Which is where Arcade Pool 2? doesn?t come in. How can pool
possibly be arcade? Oh wait, I think I know. The developers
pooled their thoughts together, and thought, hey, what if we make
a quick-and-dirty pool game over lunch, and sell it as Arcade
Pool? and voila, AP2. To back my accusations with facts, though,
here?s a rundown on just exactly how bad it is.
First off, there doesn?t seem to be a way to adjust the force with
which you hit the cue ball. In Virtual Pool 2, depending how fast
your mouse moved at the point of impact, the ball would either be
sent flying, or would gently roll towards your target. In AP2,
whether you move the mouse just a bit or whether you jerk it
upwards (which, no matter the direction the cue is facing, is the
strike movement) Moreover, there seems to be no way to cancel a
shot - or at least I was unable to.
The graphics aren?t exactly stellar, either. They aren?t disgustingly
bad, but you get pretty sick of them fairly quickly. The developers
tried to decorate the pool table with extraneous objects, like car
keys, that sort of sit on the table as if unintentionally forgotten - but
that failed: not only did I think that it was an icon that meant
something (time running out? I?m losing? I?m winning?), but they
actually sort of distracted me from the game. There?s also a
flashing icon reminding you to put chalk on your cue, the point of
which I fail to see, as well - isn?t this Arcade?
The computer opposition is very inconsistent. What do I mean by
inconsistent? I played against the best opponent, one whose name
appears somewhere in the main menu or the intro screen, and I
either lost to him horribly (like being left with 6 balls in 8-ball) or
else I won, by leaving him with a slew of balls. And in a
game of speed pool, I beat the ?top? record by over five and a half
minutes (4:30 down from 10:00). I do realise, of course, that 10:00 is
a ?default? time, but why is it under that person?s name? It makes
it look as if he completed the round in precisely 10 minutes.
Overall, this is a bad game. I absolutely cannot see why anyone in
their right mind would want to play it. But this goes back to the
phenomenon of PC-based pool games - this is not a
lucrative market, and I hope that after this title fails, game makers
will realise it. My advice, save the money and go play some real
pool instead. And by the way? why does the game make you click
in the ?top left corner? to access the menu in the intro screen?
Weird.
10/20
7/15
12/30
7/20
0/5
3/10